Good morning
India.....
Posters pasted right across JNU hundreds of them.
Jawaharlal Nehru University......
Who are the pseudo Intellectuals and so called free thinkers fooling?
Political And Religious Discrimination By Teachers And How Students Are Lured
at JNU Read on.....
The method behind the madness of the prevailing atmosphere in
JNU vividly narrated.
Young folks from second tier towns are blown off their feet when
they listen to the advocacy of free speech by left activists in JNU campus.
A coterie of students and teachers dominate campus politics
through their campus politics.
Most of the time, it is subtle. The teacher would make snide
remarks about you as you pass through a corridor and, sometimes, even while a
lecture session is on — if you do not happen to share the teacher’s political
ideology. It is not necessary that you are affiliated to the ABVP or the
teacher owes his/her allegiance to the CPM, CPI or CPI(ML)-Revolution.
The professor might have been a communist when s/he was a
student in JNU years ago, or the constant company of communist colleagues has
had an influence on his/her mindset. Saying so, however, would sound no better
than a right winger’s pet theory. So, let’s study some specific cases. The
identities of the students will stay hidden, lest their careers should be
affected. The names of the teachers must be told, however; or else this story
will not be credible.
Shankari Sundaram, as a teacher, specializes on China and
eastern Asia at the Center of International Studies’ Center for International
Politics, Organization and Disarmament (CIPOD) of JNU. Within this center,
there is the Center for Indo-Pacific Studies. In this sub-centre, there was a
student who was the topper in the written examination in the first year of his
MPhil.
The written section carries 70 marks. In the viva voce section, with a maximum
possible score of 30, Sunadaram asked this student to explain India’s “Look
East” policy. The student, who speaks so well that the teacher cannot use the
alibi of bad presentation to downgrade him, credited inter alia Prime Minister
Narendra Modi for a push to India’s diplomatic relations in the Pacific region
with a focus on ASEAN countries. Sundaram gave him a score of 1 out of 30.
The poor chap had fared so well in the written part that his promotion to the
next year could not be stopped. But the abysmal score in the oral exam brought
his overall ranking down; he is now struggling to find hostel accommodation in
the campus.
Moushumi Basu is an Associate Professor and CIPOD’s coordinator
with the Equal Opportunity Office (EOO) of JNU. Several students have heard her
boasting of having reached out to Parliament House attack convict Afzal Guru at
the Tihar Jail when he was alive. She says she used to carry food to the
criminal on death row. During one such chat in the campus, a student dismissed
pooh-poohed her ‘feat’. When it was this otherwise promising girl’s turn to
face the oral exam for her MPhil, Basu gave her a grade of 4.7 whereas a
minimum of 5 is required to move to the next year. This student is an OBC. The
alibi was predictable. When questioned by the unfortunate girl’s classmates,
Basu said that the girl’s presentation skills left a lot to be desired.
Recently, some newspapers had carried stories of caste
discrimination in the JNU administration and campus which, curiously, came up
juxtaposed to the Rohit Vemula story as though the same set of people were
responsible for the acts of discrimination in both the varsities. Now our
readers know that leftists are behind the practice of the caste scourge in JNU.
Or, they penalize a student if he appreciates the work of “BJP’s” Narendra Modi
— never mind that the country’s prime minister is an OBC, too.
ABVP students cutting across different centres of humanities in
JNU have been complaining since the NDA government took charge at the Centre
that the professors openly threaten them with comments like: “Let’s see how
long Modi lasts; he is not going to be around for 50 years, will he? Who will
protect you then?”
And how brilliant are the communist students who keep passing
these exams, living and overstaying in hostels till they are middle-aged?
Eyewitnesses of the incident of the night of 9 February say that many young
students found the demonstrations by DSU “cool”. They added to the chorus of
hailing Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhatt. While dispersing, however, they were
asking one another who this goddamn Maqbool Bhatt was. He must be another
unfortunate social activist whom Modi hanged recently, they presumed on their
way back to their hostels. Indira Gandhi must have squirmed in her afterlife.
The other day, there was a heated debate on Times Now over
letting DSU, a part of the All India Revolutionary Students Federation (AIRSF),
a frontal organization of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist),
function in university campuses. Our readers should be given a piece of
information that Arnab Goswami could not extract from his panelists. DSU cannot
be prohibited because it is not a registered union in the first place.
How does one identify DSU in a campus then? Well, the same set
of 20 odd students — including the 10 named in the poster inviting students to
the 9 February event at Sabarmati Dhaba — and teachers surface again and again
with Maoist agendas, under fanciful banners. Sometimes Anirban Bhattacharya,
“Anjali Jha”, Anwesha, Aswathi Nair, Bhavna Bedi, Komal Bharati Mohite, Reyaz
ul Haq, Rubina Saifi, Umar Khalid and Samar Khan call themselves the Cultural
Front. At times the same set becomes the Students’ League. At other times they
are the United Left. So on and so forth! That fateful night, they had invited
JNU inmates for a “Cultural Evening”.
One of the names has appeared in quotes above because she cannot be traced
anywhere in the campus. However, her name figures in the posters made by these
students again and again.
Within the DSU fold, there was an act of dissent last year.
Anirban, Anubhav, Aswathi, Banojyotsna, Gogol, Priya Dharshini, Reyaz, Rubina,
Srirupa, Umar and Ufaque resigned from the union, citing the reason of not
being allowed to speak on “gender relations and patriarchal oppression” within
the organization. They registered their protest in a private website run by
some communists like journalists Binu Mathew and Satya Sagar, filmmaker KP Sasi
and film editor Ajith Kumar B.
And how do these communist students manage to get into the good
books of their respective professors? The most effective tool the students of
AISA, AISF, SFI, DSF and the elusive DSU employ to strike a rapport with these
teachers is inviting them for post-dinner talks. The minor differences between
different communist ideologies are forgotten as both moderates and radicals
invite the likes of Kamal Mitra Chenoy, Jayati Ghosh, Mridula Mukherjee et al.
None of these teachers affiliated to different unions — or to no union while
being leftists nevertheless — ever decline an invite.
In these late night talks, students shower eulogies on the
scholars for their ‘brilliant’ informal lectures. A regular student attendee of
these talks, unless he or she is totally dumb, never fails. In contrast, the
students of the ABVP as well as those not fascinated by communism are the
regular targets of derision of these professors. Besides the teachers named
above, students complained to this correspondent against Nivedita Menon,
faculty member at the Center for Comparative Politics and Political Theory,
Sachidanand Sinha and Atul Sood, both professors at the Centre for the Study of
Regional Development under the School of Social Sciences, and Balbir Singh
Butola. Center for the Study of Regional Development.
Happymon Jacob, associate professor, Disarmament Studies at the
School of International Studies, and AK Ramakrishnan, professor, Centre for
West Asian Studies at the School of International Studies are two teachers to
watch out for their virtually secessionist views on all parts of India that
brave insurgencies, with a special interest in Jammu & Kashmir.
Students I spoke to alleged that some of these professors were
present at Umar Khalid & Co’s event at the Sabarmati Dhaba on 9 February.
Some of the interviewees suspected that Jacob and Ramakrishnan might have
played a role in organizing the function at least by inciting the student
organizers.
Names of professors who participated in the commemoration of the first
anniversary of Afzal Guru’s “martyrdom” can be seen in the following poster.
Ramakrishnan’s name can be seen in it. Along with the hyperventilating author
Arundhati Roy, one can find on the list Maoist ideologue Sujato Bhadra,
filmmaker Sanjay Kak, Manipuri activist Malem Ningthouja, Prof Tripta Wahi and
alumnus Kunwarpal Singh and anti-sedition advocate RS Bains.
Then there are instances of religious discrimination. Blunt
attacks come from the School of Language, Literature and Culture Studies’
Centre for Arabic and African Studies. The teachers are expectedly all Muslim
and students mostly so. The Hindu students of the discipline I spoke to said
they have to constantly live with the teachers’ observation that “Arabic is
Allah’s language” and, therefore, the “Hindus are not blessed” to learn it.
Two students who complained so said that they could be
identified in the class if the names of these professors came out. Therefore,
an inquiry committee must be constituted to identify who out of M Aslam Islahi
, FU Farooqi, Basheer Ahmad, Mujeebur Rahman, Rizwanur Rahman, Ubaidur Rahman,
Md Qutbuddin, Khurshid Imam and Md Akram Nawaz made these prejudiced remarks.
These are the names of faculty members at the said center.
The department of Persian language has several non-Muslim names
in the list of faculty members. But some of the Muslim professors even here
have been heard saying Muslims alone “deserve” to learn Arabic, the “language
of God”, while Persian and other languages spoken in Islamic countries may be made
accessible to lesser mortals!
A non-Muslim student of Arabic, Persian and Urdu, which
incidentally I happen to be, can vouch for the authenticity of this allegation.
It is not just in JNU where Muslim teachers create an impression that
non-Muslim students have come to the wrong classroom. We don’t deserve to learn
Arabic, their god’s language!
Let them be deluded in madrasas. In secular institutions,
shouldn’t a proper probe be initiated against these teachers and disciplinary
action taken against them?
Who will bell the cat is the question. The communists of JNU are
reportedly unhappy with the findings of the committee that found eight students
guilty of raising anti-national slogans in the campus on 9 February and
suspended them based on its report. The reason for their displeasure is that,
unlike several previous occasions, they couldn’t bulldoze their way into the
committee to issue to all accused students a clean chit. Prof GVC Naidu of the
Centre for Indo-Pacific Studies, School of International Studies, for example,
who was an SFI activist in the past but who is not involved in activism at
present, holds that JNUSU president Kanhaiya is innocent while conceding that
radical leftists are active in the campus.
Since 12 February, when the internal committee of JNU submitted
its report and action was taken against eight students, almost no teacher in
the humanities discipline is holding a regular class. All the time allotted for
lecture is spent on informal chats over police action on alleged anti-national
students. And what kind of justice is meted out by an inquiry committee whose
composition suits the communist teachers? The language school had one Arshad
Alam as a faculty member. The man’s services had earlier been terminated at
Jamia Milia Islamia after he was accused of rape. He was accused of raping a
student again at JNU. The university authorities merely dismissed him instead
of handing him over to the police.
But make no mistake. Muslim teachers alone do not have the
dubious distinction of creating an environment in the classrooms that is not
conducive to healthy learning. Parnal Chirmuley, associate professor at the
Centre of German Studies, School of Language, Literature and Culture Studies,
would make such obnoxious comments on Hindu festivities that it would be
difficult for a believer to maintain a calm composure necessary for
concentration on the curriculum. Besides dismissing festivals like Holi, Diwali
and Durga Puja, she would brag about having thrown garbage at Ganesh Chaturthi
processions while she was in Maharashtra as a mark of her protest. Chirmuley
believes the burqa is a symbol of women’s emancipation as it saves them from
the evil gaze of men! And she hails the Taliban for being “the world’s most
formidable anti-imperialist force”.
One must also know how the communist students increase the
strength of their tribe. This is necessary in the context of this article to
get the overall picture of repulsion an apolitical student might get from the
campus. Swarajya’s readers who happen to have gone to a communist-dominated
university campus of West Bengal, where professors do not overtly profess their
political views but SFI activists make the experience unbearable to no less an
extent, can relate to it.
Initially, students from the hinterland reach JNU in an
unassuming and gullible state with little or no political predilections. After
living a hell lot of taboos in their villages and small towns, the JNU campus
comes across to them as a sudden, overwhelming experience of freedom. Before the
realization sinks in, they are swept off their feet by advocacy of “free sex”.
Well, that is not the term the communists use, but that is the sense the
villager-turned-townsperson gets — more so due to the first-day reception by
girls.
In contrast, the ABVP looks dull, boring and anachronistic,
espousing views that sound regressive even to urbane right wingers. Moving
around the campus, I heard out ABVP affiliates ruing the fact that they still
couldn’t master the art of political correctness that, most importantly,
entails the right gender and caste mix. Unlike the Brahmins in communist
parties, they are also loath to using assumed surnames that would camouflage
their castes. They bemoaned the fact that no corrective measure is taken by the
RSS to make their union more appealing to the college-going youth in general.
Fence sitters are wooed — rather dragged — to the communist fold
by another technique. The communist students offer those who fail to get hostel
accommodation space in the dormitories dominated by communists. Here,
demonstrations raising typically communist issues are a regular activity. An
‘indebted’ newcomer normally obliges his communist senior when urged to join
the processions, sloganeering and talks. In due course, an apolitical yoke from
some remote corner of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Bengal, Odisha, Tamil Nadu or
Kerala turns into an indoctrinated soldier of the red brigade.
Amen