Call it by its name “India needs to legally reclassify hate crimes as acts of terror” Tanika Sarkar.My Comment

Good morning India…….

This JNU retired professor of History is at it again. I really pity Jawaharlal Nehru University who have harboured and continue to do so, such intellectual horrors of professors. They and their brethren neither have sufficient information nor depth of knowledge to really understand situations, yet sit in judgement and pass laughable comments.
Quote from her article reproduced below in the communist , government basher Seema Chistis news paper the Indian Express:

“Junaid, a young man, looking forward to Eid, was first abused and then brutally knifed to death while his brother lies wounded in a hospital. The cause? They are Muslims, hence beefeaters, hence Pakistanis, and hence easy and natural target for butchery. Note the logic: All beef eaters and all Pakistanis — and by extension, therefore, all
Muslims — are meant for slaughter.”
Fiction perpetrated by ex JNU pseudo seculars and anti nationals.

Facts which came up after investigation
“Junaid’s cousin Sanowar Khan said the conflict erupted because a group of around 15 men wanted to take over the seats where the four were sitting. The fight started because of seats and got worse because they passed communal remarks. They were carrying no meat with them.”
Statement from a co-passenger.
“An altercation took place between the three brothers and some 10 passengers over a seat. The passengers allegedly passed some remarks on the three brothers, who are Muslims, and residents of Khandawali village in Faridabad.”

The train was between Ballabhgarh in Haryana and Mathura when the passengers were attacked. Junaid (17) was stabbed to death, while his brothers Hashim (21) and Shaqir (23) were injured. The condition of Shaqir was “serious”.

One of the Muslim passengers told NDTV later that, “ the dispute started over seats in the crowded train but that the men who assaulted them used communal slurs and referred to them as persons who eat meat.”

So this irresponsible ex professor of this JNU has twisted facts and put them across to kindle communal hatred. She has also gone ahead to say that these hate crimes be reclassified as acts of terror. This is the state of the brains and intellect of our so called learned elders.
These certainly are hate crimes, no doubt about that. Yet are they crimes which can be labelled as acts of terror?

Does she really know the meaning of acts of terror?
Very briefly : Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public, a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them. Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.
Terrorism is:
1. Ineluctably political in aims and motives. Violent – or, equally important, threatens violence.
2. Designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond the immediate victim or target. Conducted either by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or identifying insignia) or by individuals or a small collection of individuals directly influenced, motivated, or inspired by the ideological aims or example of some existent terrorist movement and/or its leaders.
3. Perpetrated by a sub national group or non state entity.

Well these are not acts of terror, not by a long shot Madam Ex Professor of JNU.
Importantly, the root cause for people to lean towards hate crimes has to be eradicated. The prime cause which along with abject poverty is : Lack of Food and shelter, Lack of education, Lack of Financial and Physical Security, Unfulfilled Social needs and Self Respect.

Then why are these hate crimes being perpetrated by Hindus against our Muslim brothers? There has to be a reason. Let us look at some happenings after independence, which this ex professor should have and analysed before letting loose with her pen.

The Nehru-Gandhi pseudo royal family has faithfully preserved the anti-Hindu flavour of ‘secularism’ as handed down by the White colonial rulers who purposefully created an atmosphere that Hindus can be taken for granted. It was an exploitation of Hindu community’s tolerant and accommodative nature in which they were aided by self-serving congressmen like Nehru who proudly claimed that they were “Hindu only by birth” (which apparently latest research has proved wrong, but that they were Muslims by birth). No wonder, the ‘secularism’ of Congress – which open minded people call “pseudo-secularism” – started off with the “ignore Hindu and appease Muslim minority” mindset. It slowly turned anti-Hindu when they started calling Hindu organizations and Hindu leaders “communal” in order to corner minority votes.

After the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat, Sonia went to the extent of calling Modi “Maut Ka Saudagar”. This nasty trick to polarize Indian society on communal lines, however, stands exposed now. But it is a dangerous game of ‘vote bank’ politics in a democracy of 80 percent Hindus who, fortunately, don’t have the habit of looking at everything through religious lens – as Muslims habitually do. The rise of BJP is a serious blow to the communal politics of the entire ‘secular brigade’ whose ‘secular’ status has so far rested squarely on maligning BJP and Hindu organizations. Unfortunately the denizens of JNU still beat that same drum.

Consequences of Appeasement Politics:
Being the largest religious minority (14% of total population) the Muslim community has been the prime target of political appeasement. If the intentions were honest, with so many champions of their cause Muslims should have been the most advanced community by now. But the reality is just the opposite.

Indian Muslim community has traditionally excelled in a variety of professional skills and cultural activities and occupied a special place in the country, but groomed as ‘vote bank’ for decades. The community could not properly integrate into “new” national mainstream of ‘free and secular’ India. Simultaneously, it increasingly sank into poverty and hopelessness. Government funds for numerous schemes were generally siphoned off by the corrupt power brokers of the community. The ‘pseudo-secularists’ also started demanding “reservation” for Muslims in government jobs alongside dalits and other backward communities.

Now with this background of the last 70 years, Hindus about 80 percent, who are a majority in this Nation, have felt deprived of honest opportunity to good education, to Financial and Physical Security, so also for the fulfilment of Cultural and Social needs and Self Respect.
The present Government’s Policy of gauraksha has given this Hindu population, a very small number of the whole, a handle to vent out their frustration, sporadically, on Muslims. As days pass by this brutal venting has obtained alarming proportions.

However it will be wrong to call these acts as “Acts of Terror”, as described above. If one probes beneath this veneer of Society, one can still see Hindus and Muslims getting along fine. I would call it as an outstanding example of integration of diverse cultures. However it is the politicians of this country, who have themselves sunk into extreme depths of the cesspool of morass of their own poop and are now pulling down this great nation along with them. To get votes, power to become filthy rich, they would screw their own aunts, who are now corrupting society, which till yester years was a shining example of cultural and social integration. So also the Circumstances now prevailing world wide on the Muslim front are inflicting severe damage too.

So my dear Ex professor of History from JNU please do a rethink on these issues facing the nation. If you are a true intellectual, I expect you to find rational solutions to these problems affecting our Nations society. Just labelling these acts as acts of terror will not solve anything. Too long have these politicians and pseudo secular intellectuals mixed poison in the once harmonious society of this great Nation. It is now time to rejig from grass roots as far as India is concerned.

New Army For New India. My Comment on this pseudo Intellectual.....

Good Morning India....

I read this article, the first thing in the morning. Did contemplate a bit on it, thought of writing a blog comment then let it go. It appears everybody seems to be evolving and changing with the times including the Kashmiris, politicians, government. Yet this author expects the Army to remain like it was in Victorian times, or one might say in Pickwickian times.

I remember during my tenure in the J&K. Then there was no such thing as stone peltars or locally grown terrorists or anti nationals to that matter. It was mostly cross border terrorism or what ever. To cover their bloody deficiencies and lack of ideas to tackle the present devastating problem, it has become fashionable for the Sekulars, Human Rights people and politicians of all hues to criticise and bastardise the Army. Had the Major saab resorted to firing then what? Yes the Hurriyat and others of their ilk would have got an opportunity to yell, but then what?

The recent so called human shield has given rise to multi decibles of vile rhetoric. Specially from the Congress and the Bas****d Communists. They fail to realise or accept that, the still born baby came through Edwinas skirts during the Nehru Era at Independence and is strictly their problem and they should be the last ones to comment negatively, rather they should go hand in hand with the present GOI to find a solution to essentially a problem of their creation.

The Indian Army is also in a flux of change, trying out various means to tackle impossible situations within the impossible limits laid down by the royal Bottoms of the Judiciary and these bloody turncoats. As I stand in Major Gogois place, I realise the kind of tensions he must have gone through. Had he had a Prenomination of what his action would let loose possibly he would have acted differently.

Most probably a Jeep mounted MMG mowing down 200-300 stone pelters, terrorist supporters, separatists, a killing blood bath and rescued the poll officials and the CRPF personnel. That would have driven a lesson to the anti national separatists, terrorists, so also the Pakistani handlers on the other side. With the Special Powers Act no Court Martial or anything of the sort would be tenable. Jo karna hai kar lo (Do what ever you guys want to, I have done it, period).Yes there would have been a huge hue and cry, Human Rights buggers, NGO's the communists the congress topiwalas would have had a field day shouting from the roof tops. The criminal politicians would have instituted parliamentary committees, theJudiciary would have hit the roofs of their chambers, yet the lesson would have been driven home to the whole lot of stone throwers, instigators, separatist anti nationals, Pakistani handlers the whole lot. You buggers dont meddle with the Army or with an integral part of this country. We will do it every time. Ok you do not like it send us to barracks and sort out your dog crap which you have created since independence, the Army will not clean your poop.

Believe me Kashmir would be on its way to mending itself.

Remember the the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? At least 66,000 people were killed in Hiroshima, while 39,000 were killed in Nagasaki, totalling the deaths to about 105,000. Why did the allies resort to this? Interesting questions which these Communists and Congresse politicians might do well to read. Japan was not trying to carve out one of the US states for themselves either. Worthwhile to remember who suffered? The people they always do. Its time that these jokers realised that the Indian Army is tasked by the constitution to do particular things in a certain manner. It is not a side kick like the Bajarang dal, or the Vanar sena or the Bhim Sena or the Gau sena or what ever sena to be treated by politicians like toilet paper and thrown away after cleaning their poop. Time to drive home a lesson to these pieces of S***.

From the editorial page The Indian Express.

New Army For New India

Relationship between government, army and us is being rewritten, disturbingly so.

Written by Apoorvanand in the Indian Express

Amarinder Singh is part of the “mob” Pratap Bhanu Mehta wants the army to be wary of (‘The march to spectacle’, IE, May 29). That he has been heard by the army and the government is not surprising. Singh wanted a special medal for Major Nitin Leetul Gogoi, the army chief has obliged him. There is also no irony in Defence Minister Arun Jaitley seconding Singh in advocating a free hand to the army, said to be fighting a war in Kashmir. It is also not shocking that a chief minister, who swears by the Constitution and belongs to a “secular” party, places the army above the people when he says, “the Indian army should have an upper hand to be able to negotiate peace on terms that are favourable to the country”.

He forgets that it is for the elected government, not the army, to negotiate peace. This is the message we must read: Making the army supreme, unanswerable to parliament and the judiciary. The government recently moved the Supreme Court asking it to quash its order to investigate excesses committed by the armed forces in Manipur. This is not just about Kashmir — it is about a new India where the army would deal with people independently. We should have seen it coming when the army chief addressed the nation directly through AIR and Doordarshan on Army Day this year. This, a journalist friend felt, should be marked as a turning point for India. A new narrative is emerging in which the army is not only an institution known for its professionalism, but feared by the people, as a guardian is by potentially delinquent children.

Major Gogoi, in this new narrative, is a creative genius. He provides India with a spectacle of the humiliation of Kashmiris. The image of Dar was symbolic: Both hands of Kashmir tied by a brutal power. No bullets fired, no bloodshed, but we have not seen a more brutal picture of the humiliation of a human being in recent times. It was an act of double violence, on the man and his fellow villagers, turned into subjugated spectators.

That it did not shock us when Gogoi addressed the nation through the media after being decorated is a disturbing sign. Before him, and the current army chief, we do not remember any army officer addressing a press conference, not even after the Pakistan Army’s surrender in 1971, not after Operation Blue Star or the Kargil conflict. In all these, the army was the main actor. But it refrained from being seen as the director. It was always seen as following the civil authority. The present government is invoking nationalism to legitimise itself. It is trying to show it is the first government which backs the army. The latter is obliging by making the government’s nationalist agenda its own. Recently, the army vice chief and an air marshal participated in a government programme where offerings were made to the image of Bharat Mata, holding a saffron flag. They saluted and stood at attention when Vande Mataram was sung.

The army has been seen as a non-partisan force. In violent situations, people always sought it. But now, by allowing itself to align with a particular ideological version of nationalism, it is losing that neutrality. It suits the BJP to turn the army into a nationalist army. It is not for nothing that the image of dying soldiers is slammed onto students, artists or workers fighting for their rights.

Amarinder Singh is creating an atmosphere which legitimises a militarist, nationalist India, where the rights of the people are suspended perpetually as there would not be a time when the state is in absolute peace with all sections of its population. It is not only about Kashmir. Kashmir is only a cover.

http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/indian-army-against-kashmir-stone-pelting-new-army-for-new-india-4683374/